in

eEye Digital Security

The endpoint to vulnerability starts here.

 

Conficker - are we already protected?

Last post 09-10-2009 9:58 PM by Blue1978. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 03-31-2009 6:21 PM

    Conficker - are we already protected?

     

    Not sure why i cannot find a post about this supposed issue we might have tomorrow... but....

    If we are running blink are we already scanned and covered - or would we need to search through the pile of info on a Vulnerability scan and fix it all to be protected?

     

     

    Filed under:
  • 03-31-2009 8:53 PM In reply to

    Re: Conficker - are we already protected?

     If you have been running Blink the whole time and you use Automatic Updates to apply critical patches you are fine.

    Blink stops the vulnerability exploited by the worm and also detects and stops the worm itself.

    Regards
    Laurentiu Nicula
  • 04-01-2009 10:08 PM In reply to

    Re: Conficker - are we already protected?

     

    Perfect - thanks for the update...

     

  • 09-10-2009 9:58 PM In reply to

    Conficker Alerts

         This is for anyone interested in seeing what alerts Blink will show when another machine on the LAN is infected with the Conficker and it is trying to spread to your machine:

    1. RPC : Server Service Attack

    Event ID: BLINK-BAM-10129
    Severity: High
    Description: A vulnerability in the Server Service (MS08-067) allows remote attackers to perform remote code execution through malicious RPC requests.
    Alert: Yes
    Action: Terminated
    Attacker: 10.2.152.71
    Attacker Port: 2886
    Victim IP: 10.2.152.46
    Victim Port: 445
    Protocol: TCP
    Log File: C:\Program Files\eEye Digital Security\Blink\Captures\Sep_09_2009\capture_Sep_09_2009_17_01_32_671_01.cap


    2. RPC : Server Service RPC Attack

    Event ID: BLINK-BAM-10121
    Severity: High
    Description: There is a remote code execution vulnerability in Server Service that could allow an attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability to take complete control of the affected system.
    Alert: Yes
    Action: Terminated
    Attacker: 10.2.152.71
    Attacker Port: 2886
    Victim IP: 10.2.152.46
    Victim Port: 445
    Protocol: TCP
    Log File: C:\Program Files\eEye Digital Security\Blink\Captures\Sep_09_2009\capture_Sep_09_2009_17_01_32_671_01.cap

    ================================================

    By default, these rules are not set to create capture packets. 

         I have a newly installed Windows XP Professional machine on a network that does not get updated often (because of its remote location).  It is missing a lot of patches (hence why I put Blink on it).  I noticed these alerts on the machine about an hour or so later after I installing Blink.  At that time I enabled the packet capture feature for these two rules.  After seeing the alerts come up again, I sent the capture packets in question to eEye and they confirmed that it looked like the Conficker worm's traffic.

    Blink proves its worth again!

    Filed under: ,
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
© 1995 - 2009 eEye Incorporated